Average: 0 Your rating: None The two companies have come to a deal in the year 2007 but most of us are unaware of this..
Watch President Obama Live at the Clinton Global Initiative ...
One of the most interesting parts of the listserv email that I received from the Clinton Foundation this morning announcing the live webcast was that of the five names they mentioned of people attending, one of them was Rwandan ...
Thirty-Two Short Films About Two Ex-Presidents « Around The Sphere
While he awaited the president's arrival, Clinton was taking meetings. On the morning before CGI opened, he sat down with Danish environmental minister Connie Hedegaard to discuss the Clinton foundation's Climate Change Initiative, ...
$10 billion solar project for Gujarat
S Jagdeesan, principal secretary energy and petrochemicals in the government of Gujarat said that the 3000 MW project will get help with logistics and finding financing from the William J Clinton Foundation, a charitable group started ...
Clinton Foundation Signes Mou For 3000Mw Solar Power Plant In ...
INDIAN EXPRESS - The Clinton Climate Initiative (CCI), an initiative by the Clinton Foundation, signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Gujarat government on Monday to set up one of the largest solar power plants in the world.
Clinton Foundation To Construct 3000 MW Solar Power Plant In ...
William J Clinton Foundation's Clinton Climate Initiative (CCI) will construct a 3000 MW solar power plant in Gujarat, India, the Times of India reported. CCI will invest around INR500 billion into the Gujarat state over the next five ...
Clinton Foundation plans 3MW of solar farms in India | Inside ...
Details were not provided on how the solar plants would be funded, although the Gujarat government said that the Clinton Foundation is in talks with more than a dozen large corporations worldwide for potential involvment as investors. ...
Web design firm sues Clinton Foundation over nonpayment
News, profiles and commentary on Seattle technology startups, Microsoft, Amazon.com, gadgets, PCs, software, venture capital and Internet services.
More plaudits for Guyana's LCDS - President for key talks in New York
International experts have also supported the framework for establishing a Guyana Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) system for REDD-Plus (REDD+) with the Clinton Foundation and other groups helping to advance the process. ...
Michael Jackson what he Contributed to the world?
I worked up a list of democrat criminals off the top of my head, then added a few more through some research. Here's the list:
Current office holders:
Harry Reid: unidicted bribe taker
Jack Murtha: unidicted bribe taker
William Jefferson: has he been indicted yet?
Hillary Clinton: unidicted bribe taker
Ed Rendell: unidicted bribe solicitor
Ted Kennedy: unindicted murderer
Pat Kennedy: unindicted (censored) drunk
Robert Menendez: unindicted bribe taker
Sharpe James: unindicted you name it
Alcee Hastings: impeached and convicted judge/representative
Ray Nagin: say, Ray, what really happened to that $250,000,000 ya got from the Corps of Engineers to fix the dike? Didja think they meant dyke?
The entire government of the City of Chicago: BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
How about some former office holders?
Leo McCarthy: unindicted bribe solicitor
Al Gore: unindicted bribe taker
Robert Toricelli: unindicted mafia tool and bribe taker
Jim McGreevey: unindicted bribe taker
Marion Barry: is he still out of office, or is he back again?
Bill Clinton: unindicted bribe taker, malfeasant, seller of military secrets to foriegn governments, perjurer, rapist
Gerry Studds: unindicted child rapist
Barney Frank: unidicted child whoremonger
Wisconson Senate Majority Leader Chuck Chvala, using state employees to do political work and to illegally funneling money to a state Senate campaign. (19 other counts were dropped and Chvala served no time.)
Former Sen. Brian Burke, felony and misdemeanor pleas
Miscelleaneous democrat criminals:
John Wayne Gacy, rapist, murderer, democrat fund raiser
Michael Skakel, Kennedy, murderer
William Kennedy Smith, Kennedy, rapist
Brian Doyle, dem activist child molester
Neil Goldschmidt, Oregon governor, confessed child molester
Rep. Mel Reynolds, D-IL child rapist pardoned by clinton
Cynthia McKinney
Robert Byrd
Read this whole page for a list of democrat campaign activities. All you need for these campaign activities is a gun, a knife, some spray paint to make swastikas, some matches, and some gasoline.
Sen. Daniel Inouye, accused of sexual harrassment
Former Rep. Gus Savage, fondling peace corps volunteer
Former Sen. Brock Adams, rape
Former Rep. Fred Richmond, soliciting from a 16 year old
Former Rep. John Young, sexual harrassment of staffer
Former Rep. Wayne Hays, traded secretary job for ********
Ira Einhorn, rape and murder
Guilt by association department: Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who would be speaker of the House, and the ACLU Foundation has contributed to her campaign. That’s the same ACLU that defends the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA)
Seriously, and Democrats think they are just angels?
Here this guy is seemingly whining about how barack obama isn't doing enough on national matters. But that got me thinking. America is absolutely huge. 300 million people? AND obama is trying to take care of iraq,iran/afghanistan/pakistan.
I think america might need more than 1 head of power. What if John Mcain, Sarah Palin since she wants to run for president, And hilary clinton, she seems smart. What if we assembled a team of top people to handle all of just america's matters. And have say, barack obama, since he's doing a good job with the stanians, and his team of top people trying to befriend countries, help them out. Maybe even build factories for them to produce their own food clothes pavement and overall standard of living? Maybe if we show all countries that america is willing to help build foundations for them so they can flourish themselves, america and its team of world leaders could make a better tomorrow for not just america, but all of the world.
I suggest we try to help North Korea. If we don't they'll try to get nuclear warhead technology and I wouldn't doubt selling it to al Qaeda or Taliban for a pretty penny.
What bill/bob maher said on cambell brown on CNN about barack obama got me thinking...?
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton released a statement yesterday calling on Chinese authorities to “provide a public accounting of those killed, detained or missing, both to learn and to heal.” As noble as Secretary Clinton’s sentiment is, America’s authority to lead on human rights in China was significantly undermined earlier this year when Clinton tabled human rights issues during her February trip to the country in favor of the Obama administration’s global warming concerns.
Clinton is not the only U.S. politician that has abandoned her past concern for human rights in China. Just this past month, Speaker Nancy Pelosi avoided any talk of human rights during her China trip, also prioritizing global warming over all other concerns. Pelosi used to be a leader for human rights in China. In 1991 she helped unveil a banner in Tiananmen Square honoring “those who died for democracy in China.” But last week this was all she could muster: “In every country, not just China and the U.S., the global climate crisis is best surmounted with transparency and openness, respect for the rule of law and accountability to the people.”
Those who saw their friends die 20 years ago today, and still face persecution from the current Chinese regime, feel betrayed by the current leadership’s shift in focus. Wang Dan, who once topped the Chinese government’s most wanted list of Tiananmen leaders, told an audience at the Heritage Foundation Monday:
I’m really disappointed … that the whole international community has just turned their back to the human rights issue. I think that’s sad because the people inside China really had some hope from the concern from the international community because they have no other means to try to pursue democracy. If the United States really wants to keep its status as a stronger power, they cannot just make friends with the Chinese government but also make friends with the Chinese people.Delina and all those who argue similiar> So what are the proposed answers to global warming? More taxes, govt control, and handing our sovereignty over to the UN.
So youre telling me we need to oppress, tax, and take away liberty BEFORE we worry about people getting tortured and killed? What happened to all the compassion on the left?
What is more important? The manner in which we tax and spend for phony trendy pop culture issues? Or BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS which we all deserve?Monk>There is a solution. There are only 2 things liberal democrats respond to; public opinion polls and lost elections.
Why are democrats swapping human rights for manmade global warming?
I remember as a kid growing up I used to like these guys, but I have been just wondering if they are still in the wrestling buisiness or what they were doing if you know.Thank you in advance.
1.Sean Mooney I used to like when he interveiwed people and he would get just as excited as the guy he was interviewing.I remember he used to on big matches go in the crowd to ask them who they wanted to win.Even some that was not good the mic he helped them through it.
2.Danny Davis a good referee that went bad and got suspended only to team up few times with the hart foundation.I know he actually was a wrestler right and went by nightmare and his face was painted like Sting.
3.Todd Petingel(sorry for the spelling)I like him on the livewire and I think it was called Livewire,He used to have new guys come on and have fans call for questions to the favorite superstars.Remember him interviewing Bill Clinton during the BodyDonnas match and he spilled popcorn down sunny shirt.
4.Harvey Whipelman former manager for Sid and many others he used to be known as Downtown Bruno in the mid south.
What happened to these former employees of the WWE/F?
Base your answer to the question on the quotation below and on your knowledge of social studies.
. . . There may come a time when we elect a president at age 45 or 50, and then 20 years later the country comes up with the same sort of problems that the president faced before and the people would like to bring that man or woman back, and they’d have no ability to do so. I’d kind of like to see it changed. I don’t have terribly strong feelings about it. . . .
— President Bill Clinton, A Conversation with Former President Bill Clinton,
John F. Kennedy Library and Foundation, May 28, 2003
In this statement, President Clinton is commenting on the
a. presidential primaries
b. presidential two-term limit
c. two-party political system
d. electoral college system
Which argument was used by the Supreme Court in reaching its “clear and present danger” ruling in Schenck v. United States (1919)?
a. The military is under civilian control.
b. Powers are separated between the federal and state governments.
c. Constitutional rights are not absolute.
d. The Constitution provides for equal protection under the laws
Which group was the main target of the Palmer Raids of 1919–1920 and the McCarthy hearings of the 1950s?
a. nativists
b. industrialists
c. communists
d. African Americans
“President Jackson Signs Force Bill Against South Carolina”
“Congress Declares Southern States Must Accept 14th Amendment”
“President Eisenhower Sends Federal Troops to Little Rock, Arkansas”
Which principle is illustrated by these headlines?
a. executive privilege
b. popular sovereignty
c. limited government
d. federal supremacy
social studies help please?
I love being a conservative. We conservatives are proud of our philosophy. Unlike our liberal friends, who are constantly looking for new words to conceal their true beliefs and are in a perpetual state of reinvention, we conservatives are unapologetic about our ideals. We are confident in our principles and energetic about openly advancing them. We believe in individual liberty, limited government, capitalism, the rule of law, faith, a color-blind society and national security. We support school choice, enterprise zones, tax cuts, welfare reform, faith-based initiatives, political speech, homeowner rights and the war on terrorism. And at our core we embrace and celebrate the most magnificent governing document ever ratified by any nation--the U.S. Constitution. Along with the Declaration of Independence, which recognizes our God-given natural right to be free, it is the foundation on which our government is built and has enabled us to flourish as a people.
We conservatives are never stronger than when we are advancing our principles. And that's the nature of our current debate over the nomination of Harriet Miers. Will she respect the Constitution? Will she be an originalist who will accept the limited role of the judiciary to interpret and uphold it, and leave the elected branches--we, the people--to set public policy? Given the extraordinary power the Supreme Court has seized from the representative parts of our government, this is no small matter. Roe v. Wade is a primary example of judicial activism. Regardless of one's position on abortion, seven unelected and unaccountable justices simply did not have the constitutional authority to impose their pro-abortion views on the nation. The Constitution empowers the people, through their elected representatives in Congress or the state legislatures, to make this decision.
Abortion is only one of countless areas in which a mere nine lawyers in robes have imposed their personal policy preferences on the rest of us. The court has conferred due process rights on terrorists detained at Guantanamo Bay and benefits on illegal immigrants. It has ruled that animated cyberspace child pornography is protected speech, but certain broadcast ads aired before elections are illegal; it has held that the Ten Commandments can't be displayed in a public building, but they can be displayed outside a public building; and the court has invented rationales to skirt the Constitution, such as using foreign law to strike down juvenile death penalty statutes in over a dozen states.
For decades conservatives have considered judicial abuse a direct threat to our Constitution and our form of government. The framers didn't create a judicial oligarchy. They created a representative republic. Our opposition to judicial activism runs deep. We've witnessed too many occasions where Republican presidents have nominated the wrong candidates to the court, and we want more assurances this time--some proof. The left, on the other hand, sees the courts as the only way to advance their big-government agenda. They can't win national elections if they're open about their agenda. So, they seek to impose their policies by judicial fiat. It's time to call them on it. And that's what many of us had hoped and expected when the president made his nomination.
Some liberal commentators mistakenly view the passionate debate among conservatives over the Miers nomination as a "crackup" on the right. They are giddy about "splits" in the conservative base of the GOP. They are predicting doom for the rest of the president's term and gloom for Republican electoral chances in 2006. As usual, liberals don't understand conservatives and never will.
The Miers nomination shows the strength of the conservative movement. This is no "crackup." It's a crackdown. We conservatives are unified in our objectives. And we are organized to advance them. The purpose of the Miers debate is to ensure that we are doing the very best we can to move the nation in the right direction. And when all is said and done, we will be even stronger and more focused on our agenda and defeating those who obstruct it, just in time for 2006 and 2008. Lest anyone forget, for several years before the 1980 election, we had knockdown battles within the GOP. The result: Ronald Reagan won two massive landslides.
The real crackup has already occurred--on the left! The Democratic Party has been hijacked by 1960s retreads like Howard Dean; billionaire eccentrics like George Soros; and leftwing computer geeks like Moveon.org. It nominated John Kerry, a notorious Vietnam-era antiwar activist, as its presidential standard-bearer. Its major spokesmen are old extremists like Ted Kennedy and new propagandists like Michael Moore. Its great presidential hope is one of the most divisive figures in U.S. politics, Hillary Clinton. And its favorite son is an impeached, disbarred, held-in-contempt ex-president, Bill Clinton.
The Democratic Party today i
Why do so few people support conservative beliefs and philosophy?
Is it because after changing her story no less than 4 times people finally just started ignoring her??
This reminds me of all those people who keep saying "you don't like Obama because he's black".
Well apparently Pelosi's situation had nothing to do with what she did and everything to do with the fact that she's female (according to some).
Can you believe this sh*t??
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090523/pl_politico/22882
Not only is it bad form, say Democrats and women’s advocates, it’s bad politics.
“They can’t seem to distinguish between a backroom smirk among the boys and something you put out in public,” says former Hillary Clinton senior adviser Ann Lewis of the RNC video.
“It’s an attempt to demean your opponent, rather than debate them. If they’re serious that this is an issue of national security, then you’d think that one would want to debate it on the merits,” she says. “It’s almost as if they can’t help themselves.” ...............Eleanor Smeal, president of the Feminist Majority Foundation, believes that those who attack female leaders on gender grounds do so out of weakness.
“In a way, it shows the desperation of the opposition,” she says. “If all else fails, you do something on their looks, or you remind them of sex.”
Phil Singer, who dealt with the issue as a spokesman for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, takes it one step further, arguing that such tactics are actually likely to be counterproductive in the end.
“As the degree of viciousness escalates and increases, I think women – and most people living in the modern era, including men – are more likely to rally to Pelosi’s cause,” he says.
He suggests that gender-based attacks can actually be the crucible within which a woman’s base of support is forged.
“Certainly nobody wants to be on the receiving end of this type of rhetoric, but in the long run I think it could end up making Nancy Pelosi a stronger national figure, and creating a real base for her,” he says.elway...........I like that "Republicans" are the only ones to blame...........you act like the Democrats weren't in Congress when all this was happening.
Can you believe Nancy Pelosi is now attempting to play the "victim" card?
The Clinton Foundation, working through its Climate Initiative Program in collaboration with the U.S. Green Building Council, has developed sixteen founding projects on six continents, supported by local governments and property developers. The project will demonstrate Climate Positive strategy by setting a compelling environmental and economic example for cities to follow.
Climate Positive real estate developments will strive to reduce the amount of on-site CO2 emissions to below zero. Destiny, Florida was selected to be America's first eco-sustainable city.
http://www.clintonfoundation.org/news/news-media/press-release-clinton-climate-initiative-to-demostrate-model-for-sustainable-urban-growth-with-projects-in-10-countries-on-six-continents
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/prnewswire/2009/05/19/prnewswire200905190745PR_NEWS_USPR_____NY19306.html
What are your thoughts on the Clinton Climate Positive Development Program?
...besides the Clinton Foundation
What has Bill Clinton done after his presidency?
Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton were all very visible and busy doing a lot of things such as giving speeches and working with charitable foundations and writing books after they left office. The only ones who kind of disappeared were Nixon because he left office in disgrace, and Reagan because he had Alzheimers. What has happened to George W Bush, why do you think he has virtually disappeared?
